|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Professor Kwadwo Appiagyei-Atua, a renowned expert in International Law and Human Rights at the University of Ghana School of Law, has expressed doubts over the feasibility of enforcing the recently passed United Nations resolution on slavery. He cautioned that despite its symbolic significance, the resolution’s practical impact could face considerable hurdles.
In an interview on Joy FM’s Super Morning Show on Thursday, March 26, Prof. Appiagyei-Atua raised concerns about the process that led to the adoption of the resolution, as well as its potential to bring about meaningful change.
While acknowledging the importance of the resolution, he noted that it was passed through the UN General Assembly, a body whose decisions are not legally binding. “The concern is with the process…the UN General Assembly, although democratic, doesn’t have the power to enforce its resolutions,” he explained. “Resolutions passed in the Assembly are often just recommendations.”
He also pointed out that while 123 countries voted in favor of the resolution, three voted against it, and a significant number abstained. According to Prof. Appiagyei-Atua, these abstentions should not be dismissed lightly. “Abstention is a diplomatic way of saying ‘no,’ so in practice, it’s no different from a vote against the resolution,” he added.
A key concern for the professor was the stance of powerful nations. He emphasized that the lack of support from major global powers—either through opposition or abstention—casts doubt on the resolution’s future implementation. “The big powers voted against it or abstained, and that is what will ultimately determine whether it’s enforceable or not,” he said.
Drawing from historical precedents, Prof. Appiagyei-Atua cited efforts in the 1970s, when newly independent nations sought a new international economic order linked to issues such as slavery and colonialism. These efforts, he noted, failed due to opposition from powerful, former colonial powers. “We’ve seen this before. Resolutions are passed, but enforcement becomes difficult,” he explained. “The situation today is no different.”
When asked whether the lack of support from influential nations would hinder cooperation, Prof. Appiagyei-Atua was clear: “Definitely, yes. They will not cooperate because it’s not legally binding on them.”
Even in cases where international law is legally binding, enforcement remains an issue, according to the professor. “International law is difficult to enforce, especially when powerful nations refuse to comply. There’s little that can be done against them due to their dominance on the international stage.”
This statement follows the United Nations General Assembly’s approval of a landmark resolution, led by Ghana, recognizing slavery and the transatlantic slave trade as one of the greatest injustices in human history. The resolution also calls for reparations for the suffering caused by these atrocities. It passed with 123 votes in favor, three against, and 53 abstentions. While the resolution marks a historic step, Prof. Appiagyei-Atua’s remarks underscore the challenges ahead in making it a reality.
Story:Efua Nessa
Source:Loco tv